<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are millions of people Wrong?</title>
	<link>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/</link>
	<description>Attention Grab is an exploration of media, technology, and humanity by Jim Parker</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Parker</title>
		<link>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 23:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I do think you get it.  It's not just about having a spot on the web.  It's about existing on the web.  It's not your HTML or Javascript or URL on the internet.  It is you on the internet.  It's writing history as it happens.  "What were Jim Parker and Michael Walton talking about May 25, 2006?".  That means we have a history.  We have a link - and it is provable.

One year from now, will I remember that on this day I helped save one of my company’s partners $1.2 million?  Probably not – because I haven’t written it down (well, now it’s written down isn't it– bad example :-)   ).  But will I be able to know, in an instant that I had a conversation with Michael Walton about blogging - because it is now written down - forever.

And thanks for contributing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do think you get it.  It&#8217;s not just about having a spot on the web.  It&#8217;s about existing on the web.  It&#8217;s not your HTML or Javascript or URL on the internet.  It is you on the internet.  It&#8217;s writing history as it happens.  &#8220;What were Jim Parker and Michael Walton talking about May 25, 2006?&#8221;.  That means we have a history.  We have a link - and it is provable.</p>
<p>One year from now, will I remember that on this day I helped save one of my company’s partners $1.2 million?  Probably not – because I haven’t written it down (well, now it’s written down isn&#8217;t it– bad example <img src='http://attentiongrab.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   ).  But will I be able to know, in an instant that I had a conversation with Michael Walton about blogging - because it is now written down - forever.</p>
<p>And thanks for contributing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Walton</title>
		<link>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Walton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 20:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Although I don't blog, I think I'm beginning to understand it.

I think that what Jim is saying is that you can use a blog to express yourself globally.  You can post thoughts, dreams, pictures and the like; all refecting your interests, and let the world know you exist.

You make use the web to put this information 'out there' so that others with similar interests us might see it and respond.  Thus, creating two way communcation (or 3-way or more) with other people around the world.

You can think of it as the web's equivalent of a social gathering.  When you go out somewhere and meet a new person, you first start out by saying little things like "Hello" and "Hows the weather".  Eventually, you start talking about things that interest you both and you establish the beginnings of a relationship.

With a blog, you can post your interests and thoughts and someone who reads it may respond to your postings with their own posting, or even refer to yours with their own blog.  This creates a form of communication between the two of you.

Of course, you don't get the direct, immediate response you would get from a face-to-face meeting.  And of course, the entire web experience is much more impersonal.

But you have to think not of interacting with a cold, simple web page, but instead think of yourself as interacting with the human being that is expressing him or herself begind the web page.   Thinking like that makes the whole experience more appealing to me.

And I think also that one of Jim's goals in life is to replace the entire web page experience with an immersive virtual reality experience.  

In his mind, we would virtually see, hear, touch, and smell things in other parts of the world at any time.  We could also interact and change them at will.  It would, in essence, be the same thing as a web page, but about a million times more interactive.

I think that's enough for my first blog comment.  Cya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I don&#8217;t blog, I think I&#8217;m beginning to understand it.</p>
<p>I think that what Jim is saying is that you can use a blog to express yourself globally.  You can post thoughts, dreams, pictures and the like; all refecting your interests, and let the world know you exist.</p>
<p>You make use the web to put this information &#8216;out there&#8217; so that others with similar interests us might see it and respond.  Thus, creating two way communcation (or 3-way or more) with other people around the world.</p>
<p>You can think of it as the web&#8217;s equivalent of a social gathering.  When you go out somewhere and meet a new person, you first start out by saying little things like &#8220;Hello&#8221; and &#8220;Hows the weather&#8221;.  Eventually, you start talking about things that interest you both and you establish the beginnings of a relationship.</p>
<p>With a blog, you can post your interests and thoughts and someone who reads it may respond to your postings with their own posting, or even refer to yours with their own blog.  This creates a form of communication between the two of you.</p>
<p>Of course, you don&#8217;t get the direct, immediate response you would get from a face-to-face meeting.  And of course, the entire web experience is much more impersonal.</p>
<p>But you have to think not of interacting with a cold, simple web page, but instead think of yourself as interacting with the human being that is expressing him or herself begind the web page.   Thinking like that makes the whole experience more appealing to me.</p>
<p>And I think also that one of Jim&#8217;s goals in life is to replace the entire web page experience with an immersive virtual reality experience.  </p>
<p>In his mind, we would virtually see, hear, touch, and smell things in other parts of the world at any time.  We could also interact and change them at will.  It would, in essence, be the same thing as a web page, but about a million times more interactive.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s enough for my first blog comment.  Cya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Parker</title>
		<link>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 14:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>It looks as though you are already hooked.  You addict you.

(oh, and by the way, you've just contributed to the relationship!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks as though you are already hooked.  You addict you.</p>
<p>(oh, and by the way, you&#8217;ve just contributed to the relationship!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sundar</title>
		<link>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Sundar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://attentiongrab.com/2006/05/are-millions-of-people-wrong/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I understand and I do not understand.
(It is a duality which exists every where arround us)
Wait, may be I resisting to accept it (blogging)... since this is started recently and new to me (like you said about your grandma in another blog...) or Am I old already...? or is it a new phenomenon I fail to understand? 
Whatever... I think I need time to grasp and then make time to read the blogs (if convinced).

I think it is some kind of addiction.
I fully support the idea about contribution and sharing... but the relationship part is what I do not fully understand.

Thanks for the reply... (how much time you spent on typing that out)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand and I do not understand.<br />
(It is a duality which exists every where arround us)<br />
Wait, may be I resisting to accept it (blogging)&#8230; since this is started recently and new to me (like you said about your grandma in another blog&#8230;) or Am I old already&#8230;? or is it a new phenomenon I fail to understand?<br />
Whatever&#8230; I think I need time to grasp and then make time to read the blogs (if convinced).</p>
<p>I think it is some kind of addiction.<br />
I fully support the idea about contribution and sharing&#8230; but the relationship part is what I do not fully understand.</p>
<p>Thanks for the reply&#8230; (how much time you spent on typing that out)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
