Featured Articles
February 26, 2008 by Jim Parker in Internet Business, media, twitter
Fred Wilson writes about a great idea for Twitter in Event Firehoses in Twitter.
I think that is a great idea. This is something I have been thinking about for quite a while. Wouldn’t it be great to be able to subscribe to an event in such a way.
For the sake of discussion, I like to throw a couple of problems and a possible alternative solution:
First, in order for a person’s tweet to show up in the event, they would have to use one of the tracking keywords. That means correct spelling is required and existence of that keyword is a obviously critical. “John Stewart” and “Jon Stewert” wouldn’t be picked up. My idea of what keyword is associated to the Oscars event might be different than yours. Or, I might be a horrible speller.
But also, that means tweets couldn’t become part of the context of the event unless a keyword was present. “Wow he just slipped on stage” (as Colin Farrell and John Travolta did) wouldn’t show in the feed as there are no keywords that identify the context – yet obviously, this tweet should appear in the “Oscar Event Feed”.
So what is an alternative?
What if Twitter had the concept of events built in? For example, the organizers of the Oscars could register “Oscars” event at a Twitter event config site. Then, from my phone, IM, Twitter client, or via the web, I could get a list of current/upcoming events. If I had done that Sunday night, I would have seen “Oscars” as a list of events of the night. Then, I could type eventon Oscars on my phone. From this point on, all tweets I send would go to the “Oscars” event group. Also, I would receive all tweets from other people who were attending (have joined) the “Oscars” event via Twitter.
So rather than depending on keywords, I simply join an event. I get all tweets within the event context. When the event is over (i.e. the twitter event expires) then I stop getting tweets in that context.
Custom Twitter Nodes is the Answer-
In my opinion, it is this sort of functionality that will (should) take Twitter to the next level. What if Twitter were to add the concept of Custom Twitter Nodes where people could setup and configure Nodes to meet the needs of their event, or group, or whatever? The possibilities are endless were Twitter to start offering “Custom Twitter Nodes”. Events would be one type of node with a set of rules. Perhaps there would be a Private Twitter Node type that people could setup and join without content being publicly available. How about an Custom Twitter node at the club? Or a conference? What about a Custom Twitter Node type for the grocery store? Hmmmm. Somebody might pay for that.
Yes, much of this functionality can be hacked by third parties. And many of these third parties are doing great and cool stuff. However, this type of service - Twitter Events via Custom Twitter Nodes - would be much better if it were provided by Twitter itself.
May 17, 2006 by Jim Parker in Internet Business
Is Microsoft coming back? No.
Is Google the next Microsoft (Microsoft which eventually doesn’t come back)? Yes.
Will Google be anywhere around $500/share in 5 years? No.
Is Apple the next Google which is the next Microsoft which eventually doesn’t come back? Yes.
Do I still wanna be the next Apple? Yes.
by Jim Parker in Internet Business, media
It looks like the Old Media Companies have their own idea about Media 2.0. Though they’re smart enough to not call it “Media 2.0″. I think they’ve got it figured out. The mainstream media is definitely changing. I believe that Old Media is well positioned to reap the benefits of the value they are creating.
What most people forget about the Media business is that it is all about entertainment FIRST. Entertainment value is the most significant factor in the media business. Things like search cost and distribution cost and microchunking cost (sorry umair ) don’t add up to a hill of beans when it comes to true entertainment value. Media still does an outstanding job of entertaining us.
But will innovative new things in search, distribution, and reconstruction add significant value in the near future?
Absolutely, but only at the pace that the PUBLIC wants. That’s right. It’s the Users that drive demand - not the media 2.0 Pundits.
Other Posts By Jim
What a wonderful fall it has been, truly a dream come true. I’ve been dying to come back and write about all my news. I’ve got a lot to talk about.
Arianna and Ethan are doing well - they are a very loud bunch. They’ve brought joy to my life I never knew I could have.
Thus, […]
All machines are human.
Some would question whether there is anything human about a robotic welder on the factory floor, or a stamping machine that stamps out quarter panels for a new car, or a 1000 node grid computer, or even a bolt.
Let’s consider the humanity of the bolt. This is a wonderful piece of technology […]
Boy have I got a lot to learn…
On his site, Umair made a comment on one of my a recent posts. My post included this:
“…Things like search cost and distribution cost and microchunking cost (sorry umair ) don’t add up to a hill of beans when it comes to true entertainment value.” jim parker
Umair added:
“What is […]
Avatars will become our agents, handling all contacts with the world when we don’t want to or when we can’t.
We can’t be everywhere all of the time. But we want to be. Back in the day, we purchased answering machines, and then voice mail. These were (are) a very simple way of communicating to anyone […]
What is Attention? Attention is Everything.
We all have a limited amount of resources. Money, Time, Capital, and Talent are just a few of the more important ones.
It suffices to say that if you have enough of the above resources, you can do anything - which means you can do everything you ever wanted to do. […]
Things of Interest
Attention Grab is an exploration of media, technology, and humanity by Jim Parker
Contact
Subscribe
Twitter - What am I doing now?
What I'm Reading
What I'm Looking At
www.flickr.com
|
What I noticed
Categories
Archives
Attention Grab Author
More Info
My Other Spots